Performance Management Process
Old Dominion University's performance management process is designed to reward employees for their work contributions in a fair and equitable manner. The Performance Management Process is an annual cycle that encompasses three phases:
Performance Planning and Evaluation
If you have any questions or need any assistance with the evaluation process, please contact HR Employee Relations.
Performance Review Periods
Jan 1 - Dec 31: The Performance Year for Classified Employees runs January through December to follow the Commonwealth of Virginia performance schedule. (Updated September 2025)
May 1 - Apr 30: The Performance Year for AP Faculty is typically May through the following April annually.
- Planning - Guidelines state that performance planning or objective setting should occur at the beginning of the performance cycle (May - April). Set goals by May 1.
- Monitoring - Managers/Supervisors should observe and document regular ongoing feedback of employee performance throughout the performance year (May 1 - April 30).
As part of this year’s evaluation cycle, you have two options for completing AP Faculty evaluations:
-
Pilot Process:
-
For Evaluators: If you are using the evaluation process, please access the Evaluation Form by [clicking here].
-
For Self-Evaluations:If you are completing a self-evaluation through the pilot process, please [click here].
-
-
If you prefer to use the previous evaluation process:
Any completed documentation must be submitted to Human Resources for filing in the employee’s official personnel folder.
Please note:
All completed performance evaluations, whether using the pilot or former process, are due by June 2. If you don't use the pilot process, AP Faculty Evals must be submitted via e-mail to apfacultyevals@odu.edu.
Thank you for your continued commitment to supporting and advancing our evaluation process.
|
Milestone |
Description |
Deadline |
|
Self-Evaluation Submission |
All A/P faculty must complete and submit their self-evaluation via Microsoft Forms. |
May 20, 2025 |
|
Evaluator Review Deadline |
Supervisors must complete and submit their evaluations of employees. |
June 2, 2025 |
|
Performance Meetings |
Meetings to review and discuss evaluations with employees must be completed. |
May 30, 2025 |
|
Final Submission |
All evaluations must be finalized and submitted . |
June 2, 2025 |
Ensuring position descriptions are current helps us accurately reflect roles, responsibilities, and expectations, which is especially important as we prepare for SACS accreditation.
Action Items:
- Review and update position descriptions for all A/P faculty members
- Submit updates electronically to hrcompclass@odu.edu or via PAPERS as an "Update" action
- If no changes are needed, simply update the review date and submit electronically
- If title or responsibilities have changed, submit a Redefinition
- When submitting via email, use this subject line: "SACS 2025 PD Update – [Position Number]" (e.g., "SACS 2025 PD Update – FA067A")
- Submit updates for medical campus positions here
If you need help finding the latest version of a position description, email hrcompclass@odu.edu
Planning Phase
- Develop or update the Position Description in the performance management system. Seek suggestions from non-probationary employees for noting changes to duties/responsibilities.
- Obtain the Reviewer’s approval prior to providing the position description and performance plan to the employee.
- Meet with the Employee to review and discuss.
Observing, Documenting and Communicating Phase (Ongoing Feedback)
- Observe and document Employee’s performance results.
- Coach, counsel and provide ongoing feedback within the Performance Management System.
- Complete and review Interim Evaluation(s) with the employee.
- Address unsatisfactory performance by implementing Performance Improvement Plans in accordance with the procedures outlined in the Performance Management policy.
Self-Evaluations Phase
- Employees are required to complete annual self-evaluations within 14 calendar days as directed by the Division of Talent Management and Culture. Self-Evaluations will be completed prior to the supervisor’s annual evaluation of the employee.
Evaluating Performance Phase
- Identify all performance documentation to be used to prepare the annual performance evaluation and the respective rating.
- Draft the performance evaluation and submit it to the Reviewer for approval.
- Supervisors must review comments and ratings from the employee’s self-evaluation and should consider the employee’s ratings and comments as they’re completing the supervisor evaluation. Supervisors are not required to use the employee’s ratings and comments.
- Provide the employee with the annual evaluation to review prior to the performance evaluation meeting.
- Meet with the employee to discuss the performance review.
- Consider the employee’s perspective or suggestions and make changes to the evaluation as appropriate. Be sure to involve the Reviewer.
- If the evaluation rating is appealed to the Reviewer, meet, discuss and make changes to the evaluation as directed.
- Following the evaluating performance phase, the planning phase resumes.
The new performance cycle for non-probationary classified employees is January 1 – December 31.
There are four standard competencies:
- Problem Solving, Judgement, Planning, and Organization (5%)
- Citizen and Customer Interaction (5%)
- Teamwork and Building Relationships (5%)
- Coaching and Communication (5%)
Overall Rating consists of 80% Performance Objectives and 20% Competencies.
Employees will be provided one of five performance ratings on both Interim and Annual Performance Evaluations for each performance objective and competency resulting in an overall rating of:
- Unsuccessful - the employee did not meet the expectations of the performance objective and competency.
- Partially Successful - the employee occasionally met the expectations of the performance objective and competency but was not consistent and at times did not meet the expectations.
- Successful - the employee consistently met the expectations of the performance objective and competency.
- Highly Successful - the employee exceeded the expectations of the performance objective and competency some of the time.
- Extraordinary - the employee consistently exceeded the expectations of the performance objective and competency
See also:
Employee Self-Evaluation
A self-evaluation is not mandatory, but is highly recommended. Supervisors should encourage employees to submit a substantive self-evaluation that may include:
- Significant accomplishments or contributions this performance cycle;
- Successful performance of any new tasks or additional duties outside the scope of their regular responsibilities;
- Factors that have attributed to their professional development this performance cycle;
- Challenges faced during the performance cycle;
- Goals for the upcoming performance cycle.