Represenatation as Argumentation    
     
 

Consider the weather giraffe at the left. The giraffe is arguing that the weather will be close to perfect. Is the giraffe wrong? The evidence that the giraffe collects clearly allows the giraffe to draw these conclusions. But the average people below the clouds would not draw these conclusions, especially they experienced dark, cloudy all day. So, again I ask, is the giraffe wrong?

What we see here is a difference in perspective. The weather to the giraffe means something completely different than the humans because of the different perspectives.

So if this giraffe is working for the Weather Channel, how would the giraffe represent the weather? What ype of arguments would the giraffe make?