To
understand the concept of differentiated staffing, we must think of
different professional levels. The lowest level is the paraprofessional.
A paraprofessional would be the student going out and becoming a volunteer
in the PRIME program. They're available to do whatever the teacher needs.
It could be tutoring, stapling or anything. Paraprofessionals generally
have 1-2 years of college. They are different from clerks or technicians
in that they aspire to be a professional, but are presently unqualified
to do the full work.
The next level is the ASSISTANT TEACHER. These are students doing their
practicum and occasionally teach. Usually, when assistant teachers teach
there's a teacher present. Assistants are not really regarded as teachers,
they are just considered knowledgeable in certain areas and utilized
to make presentations when the teacher wants a break or is swamped.
This is a fair and reasonable system. The next level is INTERNS. Interns
are students of education during their student teaching year and have
full responsibilities in classrooms. I make the distinction between
interns and student teachers because the student teacher is similar
to the assistant teacher but is really just training, whereas the intern
is considered a predictable staff member. As a predictable member of
the staff, the intern can be counted upon to do things that a regular
teacher would ordinarily do (like taking full responsibility for your
classes). The difference between an intern and a regular teacher is
that interns have very close supervision. In our PRIME program, you'd
have a PRIME supervisor who is paid $2,000 to help you during the year.
During the first part of the year you actually co-teach one class with
your PRIME advisor so you can see how they solve the day-to-day problems
of teaching. The ASSOCIATE TEACHER is a different level, a sideways
level. The associate teacher is fully prepared and credentialed, but
for whatever reason chooses to only work part-time. I argue that we
don't use part time teachers enough. The way schools are organized now;
part-time teachers are a pain in the neck because the school is only
geared to deal with full-time teachers. There are a lot of people who
could be very effective part time associate teachers. For example, I
would like to have the conductor of the Virginia Symphony be the orchestra
teacher in a high school. That would be a great resource. That teacher
would come in maybe two hours a day conducting the orchestra and helping
with the advanced rehearsals. They would definitely need some staff
to give support, but that could be worked out. I use this example to
show that associate teachers are not low level teachers, they're just
there part-time or there to do a specialized task. The FULLY PROFESSIONAL
TEACHER is the person who has "been there, done that", is trained, performs
well and can be counted on. Above the professional teacher is the master
teacher, or mentor. You will recall, I was saying in the last lecture
that I firmly believe that teachers should be paid the same as administrators.
The highest paid teachers and administrators should be paid the same.
The highest paid kindergarten teacher and college professor should be
paid the same, the highest paid teacher and a well paid doctor or lawyer
should be paid the same. For that to happen, you have to have this very
special category of master teachers or mentors. In a school like Lake
Taylor High School, with a staff of 125, you would have maybe six master
teachers, about the same administrators. In an elementary school you
might have about two master teachers. Who are they? They are leaders
of their professions who are able to help other teachers and are outstanding
professionals called upon as consultants. In the US, one of the reasons
why things don't work well is because only 47% of the money spent on
personnel in schools, on average, is spent on teachers. That means more
than half is spent on administrators. What happens when your weak teachers
require specialists or administrators' help? You need to hire those
administrators, who are expensive and you have even less money left
for teachers. Then their salaries get worse and quality of teachers
gets weaker. It's a downward spiral. If there's going to be change,
you have to reconceptualize the role of the senior professional teacher
or mentor in the classroom. Presently, senior people get gold stars
on their rooms and are maybe paid a little more. I think it is very
unfortunate.