|
5.2.4
Assorted Problems
Another issue facing
designing a curriculum to take in the forgotten half is the issue of frills
versus basics.
A high school in the upper-class suburb not only has the "basics"
mastered but they also have all the frills and the sophistication of music,
language and. They're sophisticated kids. Now, assuming momentarily we
have an ideal, racist free society and two students end up competing for
the same job. They both have good basic skills, but one is really sophisticated
and the other isn't. Who's going to get hired? Obviously the sophisticated
one will.
The real world works
with sophistication, doesn't it? And art and music and literature are
not "frills," they are part of the sophistication of the society.
Neurology learning shows a synergism between the arts and the sciences.
If you teach people a lot of sciences without the arts, you get a technician
and not a scientist. Incidentally, teaching someone only the arts doesn't
end in good results either. So we need both frills and basics if we are
going to reach the forgotten half. Serving the forgotten half by just
giving them good basics is just another kind of institutionalized racism.
Another problem is
that often times the same requirements in school for different kids will
produce different results. If you are in a family where you are using
your sophistication all the time and you are engaging in philosophical
discussions with your mother while studying such things in school, you
will inevitably be a stronger person. That is why we need to make sure
that the forgotten half at least gets this type of discussion in school.
Think of it the other way around. How many academic kids would really
like to have to study automobile mechanics as part of the frills
for their education? Perhaps not many, but common sense would dictate
that they would benefit immeasurably if they did. (Society just needs
a higher degree of appreciation for vocational skills.)
Role Models and Counter-productive
Incentives Another problem facing the forgotten half is the problem of
.Too often times the ghetto kid has as a role model the successful drug
dealer who's strutting around with fancy clothes and a car. Even if the
ghetto kid decides to play it straight, the only real option to follow
is to sling hamburgers at McDonalds for minimum wage. What would you choose
in their exact same circumstances?
We also have the
problem of counter-productive incentives. We sometimes give people the
incentives for the wrong things, and if we don't understand the incentives
systems that kids are working from, we are likely to not make very good
decisions as teachers. For example, you may think you are giving a kid
an unsatisfactory grade when the kid is very delighted with it, and these
create all sorts of counter-productive incentives.
"Real Time"
Remediation There are some easy steps a teacher can take in the classroom
to help kids caught up in the forgotten half. One thing
is "real time" remediation. When someone starts falling behind,
that is the time to provide remediation and to really pile on the remediation
until the kid has either mastered the material or until you know that
there is nothing more you can do. The problem is that we don't have the
resources right now in junior high or in elementary school to really provide
the real time remediation necessary to support kids when they are having
trouble. Instead of reteaching skills to students until they get them,
those students who are slow are advanced through the curriculum at the
same pace as their faster-learning peers. This means that their baggage
of unlearned concepts amasses rapidly until it reaches a critical mass
and the student is so far behind they are beyond conventional help.
Cooperative Learning
Another step teachers can try is cooperative learning. Cooperative learning
is tough. The default position is simply to say "cooperative learning
is too tough to pull off." Unfortunately that is the wrong answer
because cooperative learning and learning from each other turns out to
be one of the most powerful ways for people to learn. The problem is that
cooperative learning has not become embedded in the instructional expectation
of the society. We need to start looking at ways to develop powerful cooperative
learning early on. Most of you have had some group experience, but some
of you have never worked in groups before in terms of any large assignment.
Because group work is not used regularly or effectively, it becomes something
people worry about or they feel is somehow unfair.
Personal Support
and Social Infrastructures Another teacher tactic is personal support.
I think teachers need to do a whole lot more to provide special personal
support for the students and to get personally involved in the lives of
their students. That is one of our jobs. As I start to get to know students,
I can find what special needs they have and try to address those needs.
Analyzing the social
infrastructures students are involved in also helps in dealing with your
students, especially the forgotten half. For the forgotten half these
infrastructures are crucial and each situation has unique dimensions,
problems and opportunities. Take, for example, school and community relations.
Schools often times don't have very good relations with their community
because they don't give a very high priority to working with their community.
They just kind of do their own thing. When the school gets to crunch time,
it is deprived of a lot of potential support
that the community could provide if the community knew what was going
on in the school and if the school took the time to keep the community
informed.
Schedules
Another problem is the problem of schedules. Scheduling is a problem because
there are different forms of schedule that achieve very different things.
Schools can not seem to decide on one set schedule (this is one reason
I argue for a national curriculum, do create compatible scheduling). There
are two basic scheduling types; block scheduling (small intense classes
that cover a years material in half a year) and standard scheduling (big
slow moving classes that cover their material is a full year). In Virginia
there is a strong emphasis on block scheduling.
The evidence is very
strong that you learn more in a block schedule system than you do in the
standard schedule. The reason for this is that in a block schedule the
typical teacher will deal with 75 kids in a semester rather than 150.
Teachers can really keep track of, and give a lot more personal attention
to, 75 kids instead of 150.
However, block scheduling
creates horrendous problems because right now in some school districts
there are schools on block scheduling and other schools on standard scheduling.
This means that if a student who is planning to take Algebra in the spring
happens to change schools at Christmas, and the new school only teaches
Algebra in the fall, then the student is suddenly a semester behind. The
obvious solution is to standardize scheduling, but arguments for local
control of schools prevent this from being done effectively.
 |
What
are three steps teachers can take to help the "forgotten half"?
|
|
 |
Mrs.
Carter teaches a special-education class in an inner-city school in
which all of the students have been diagnosed with a specific emotional
or behavioral disorder that adversely affects their academic performance.
Her students come from mainly lower-class socio-economical backgrounds
and are extremely difficult to motivate because they all feel part
of the "forgotten half". What can Mrs. Carter offer to them
as incentives for their grades and goals? |
|
| |
|
|
|