|
.4
Modifying Instruction Based on Feedback
Modifying your instruction
based on feedback is not simple. You can't just say, "Well if they're
not getting it, I should change the instructional design." This can
be problematic because it may be that students don't look like they're
getting it now, but next week they will. Be very sophisticated in the
way you use the feedback to modify your instruction. One of the approaches
is comprehensive student monitoring. There is a stereotype that learning
takes place like this: You start from nothing and you go straight to June.
The students supposedly learn everything at a steady rate and by the end
of the year know everything that you have taught them. This stereotype
is, unfortunately, wrong.

We did an experiment
at Stanford with a student French teacher. We gave them a weekly "final"
exam to see how well they mastered the material as it was being taught
to them. At the beginning we expected them to do poorly and then as the
school year progressed, to do better and better. Every week we retested
to measure how well each student improved from the week before.
It was a disaster!
When we gave the final exam on the first day of class, we told the class
what we were doing and we put a big chart up on the board illustrating
the class' learning curve.
On the first day,
three students got A's on the final exam. The reason this was so disastrous
was that these were the students the teacher would like to take credit
for at the end of the semester -- these were the star kids in the class.
Our early final exam showed us that they already knew the course material,
though, so this prevented the teacher from taking credit for their success.
To find out that they already know the stuff you're going to teach takes
all the wind out of your sails. But at least we had a baseline.
At the end of the
next week we gave another test. The scores went down. We were astounded.
How can scores go down? It looked like students were unlearning things
-- forgetting things they already knew!

The next week they
went down again.
The third week they went down further.

What in the world
was going on? It was total chaos. Parents and students were very concerned.
The cooperating teacher was the head of the department - a very effective
teacher and supervisor. He was totally bewildered: "The student's
doing a great job, she's doing everything right. What's going on here?"
If we could have quietly stolen into the classroom and wadded that chart
up on the board and thrown it away, we would have gladly done it. However,
we were in the middle of a big experiment. We were locked in.
Fortunately, in the
fourth week the scores went up. At the end of the ninth week scores were
even higher than we predicted.

We looked at the
instruction very carefully. What we now know is that when students learn
new material, confusion is often produced. Performance may actually GO
DOWN as students are struggling to learn new skills. In fact, this is
not an unusual learning curve.
Another learning
curve describes the perversity of potential learning curves for individual
students.
You teach and nothing
happens, and then all of a sudden they get it.

Now, if the final
exam comes in the ideal spot, right after all the students have mastered
the material, all is well.
If it comes too late,
time has been wasted where the students aren't learning anything.
If the final exam
comes too early, it's a huge disaster.
As you can see here,
when and where the final exam comes is an absolutely crucial part of the
learning process. Feedback is vital because interpreting it in a professional
way will inform the teacher where the students are in their learning curves,
and thus ensure that testing is done properly.
 |
Why
is feedback vital to teachers? |
|
 |
Mrs.
Copeland is an Algebra II teacher that has no idea where to start
with this term's class. The students all came from different teachers
for Algebra I, and some know much more than others do. How can she
effectively make sure that all of her students learn from her class
regardless of what they learned in the previous years? |
|
| |
|
|
|